4 Indiana Ave Valparaiso, IN 46383
in**@*******aw.com
Langer & Langer represents patients and families in Indianapolis and across Indiana after serious medical errors. If a doctor, hospital, or healthcare provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care and that failure caused preventable harm, we help you understand your options and pursue compensation under Indiana law.
Our experienced Indianapolis medical malpractice lawyers handle claims involving misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, surgical mistakes, birth injuries, hospital negligence, and anesthesia errors, including cases tied to emergency care and outpatient treatment.
Whether you’re coping with complications, long-term disability, or a wrongful death loss, our team can review the records, identify where care broke down, and guide you through the next steps.
Request a free consultation to discuss what happened and whether your medical records support a malpractice claim.
You don’t have to know every medical detail to have a potential claim. What matters is whether your provider’s care fell below the accepted standard and caused preventable harm, something your medical records and a qualified expert review can usually show.
Not every poor medical outcome is malpractice. A bad outcome can happen even when a provider follows accepted medical standards. Medical malpractice is different; it involves care that falls below the accepted medical practice and causes harm that could likely have been avoided with appropriate treatment, testing, monitoring, or follow-up.
In Indiana, a medical malpractice claim generally requires proof of four core elements:
If one of these elements is missing, the case can fail even if the care felt wrong. That’s why medical records and qualified expert review matter early.
You don’t need to “prove malpractice” before talking to a lawyer. But certain patterns are strong signals that your records should be reviewed by a medical malpractice attorney and appropriate experts:
If this reflects what you went through, our Indiana medical malpractice lawyers can review your records at no cost and explain your options.
Our Indianapolis medical malpractice attorneys handle a wide range of claims involving serious, preventable medical errors. Each case reflects a breakdown in care that caused physical, emotional, or financial harm to our clients.
Below are the most common types of malpractice we pursue on behalf of injured patients and their families:
Hospitals can be responsible when system failures like unsafe policies, staffing issues, poor supervision, or preventable infections contribute to patient harm. These cases often involve breakdowns in monitoring, discharge planning, or care coordination across departments.
Surgical malpractice may involve wrong-site mistakes, retained objects, avoidable organ damage, or failures in surgical planning and post-op monitoring. We examine what was done, what should have been done, and whether the surgical team met the standard of care at each stage.
When cancer, stroke, sepsis, internal bleeding, or other serious conditions are missed or diagnosed too late, treatment can be delayed until the outcome becomes far worse. These cases often turn on what symptoms were documented, what tests were ordered, and whether follow-up occurred when it should have.
Errors during pregnancy, labor, or delivery can cause devastating outcomes for infants and mothers. Our medical negligence lawyers review fetal monitoring, response time to distress, delivery decisions, and the use of instruments to determine whether preventable mistakes led to injuries such as brachial plexus damage or brain injury.
Medication mistakes can happen at prescribing, dispensing, or administration – wrong drug, wrong dose, dangerous interactions, allergy oversight, or lack of monitoring. We investigate where the medication process failed and how it contributed to the injury.
Busy emergency departments still must triage correctly and act on time-sensitive symptoms. ER malpractice often involves failure to order appropriate tests, delayed admission, premature discharge, or missed signs of stroke, heart attack, internal injury, or infection.
Anesthesia errors can involve dosing problems, airway management failures, missed contraindications, or inadequate monitoring. Because anesthesia injuries can be catastrophic, these cases typically require careful record review and expert analysis of vitals, timing, and intraoperative decisions.
Missed findings on imaging like tumors, internal bleeding, fractures, or stroke indicators can delay treatment until the window for a better outcome is gone. We analyze imaging reports, comparison studies, and communication of critical results to determine whether interpretation or reporting fell below the standard of care.
Many malpractice cases involve failures in handoffs critical test results not relayed, medication changes not documented, or patient history not shared between providers. We trace where communication broke down and how that breakdown contributed to the harm.
Heart-related conditions require fast, accurate decision-making. Claims may involve misread EKGs, delayed treatment of heart attack symptoms, failure to order appropriate testing, or inadequate monitoring after a cardiac event or procedure.
Patients have the right to understand the material risks, expected benefits, and reasonable alternatives before agreeing to a procedure. A signed consent form does not automatically prevent a claim if key risks were not explained, alternatives were not discussed, or the patient’s decision was not truly informed under the circumstances.
Dental malpractice can involve wrong-tooth extraction, avoidable infection, nerve injury, or sedation and anesthesia errors. In serious cases, sedation or airway complications during dental procedures can lead to oxygen deprivation, brain injury, or other lasting neurological harm. We review dental and anesthesia records to determine whether care fell below the standard of care and caused injury.
In Indiana, medical negligence liability can extend beyond just your doctor. Any licensed provider or healthcare facility that fails to meet professional standards may be held accountable.
Potentially liable parties include:
Physicians and medical specialists:
Errors in diagnosis, treatment decisions, procedures, or follow-up care can create liability when they fall below the standard of care.
Hospitals, urgent care centers, and surgical clinics:
Facilities may be responsible for unsafe systems, inadequate staffing, poor supervision, or negligent policies that contribute to patient harm.
Nurses, nurse practitioners, and support staff:
Mistakes in monitoring, medication administration, triage, documentation, or escalation of care can lead to serious injuries.
Pharmacists and pharmacies:
Liability may arise from dispensing the wrong medication, incorrect dosing, dangerous interactions, or failure to catch clear prescribing errors.
Anesthesiologists and surgical teams:
Preventable harm can occur from anesthesia dosing, airway management mistakes, surgical planning errors, or poor intraoperative monitoring.
Radiologists, lab professionals, and imaging centers:
Missed findings, delayed reporting, or incorrect test interpretation can delay treatment and worsen outcomes.
Emergency room doctors and staff:
Failure to triage correctly, order appropriate tests, or act quickly on time-sensitive conditions can be catastrophic.
Healthcare corporations or provider groups:
Corporate entities may be liable for hiring, training, supervision, scheduling pressures, or system-level practices that reduce patient safety.
Our malpractice attorneys evaluate each case thoroughly to determine where the failure occurred and who can be held legally responsible. Whether it’s a hospital malpractice claim or doctor negligence, we pursue full accountability for your harm.
When medical care goes wrong, patients are often left with two problems at the same time: new health complications and no clear answers. In Indianapolis cases, the paper trail matters early – hospital charting, imaging timelines, medication administration, discharge decisions, and provider handoffs can make or break whether the facts support a claim.
Here’s how we help:
Many Indiana medical malpractice claims resolve through settlement, but we prepare every case for litigation when the provider or insurer disputes fault, causation, or damages.
Indiana medical malpractice claims follow a structured, step-based process. We start the claim correctly, keep deadlines on track, and present the case in a way that’s clear, organized, and supported by the medical record.
We typically start by filing a Proposed Complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance (IDOI), using the required format and fees. A Proposed Complaint is considered filed when it’s delivered to the Department with the required filing/processing fees, and if it’s mailed using a trackable method, it’s treated as filed on the postmark date.
A Medical Review Panel is a screening step used in many Indiana malpractice cases before litigation can fully proceed in court. A panel is not automatically formed just because a Proposed Complaint is filed; a party must request it, and the request can be made not earlier than 20 days after the Proposed Complaint is filed.
When requested, the panel generally consists of three healthcare providers and an attorney chair who manages the process.
The panel process is mostly paper-based. We submit records and written evidence (often including expert support), and the panel issues an opinion about whether the care appears consistent with professional medical expectations. The chair can set a schedule for submissions to keep the review moving.
That opinion doesn’t “end” the case, but it can shape what happens next, whether the claim is positioned for settlement discussions or moves forward in court.
Even strong cases can lose momentum because of avoidable filing or process issues, such as:
Indiana has a specific malpractice system with rules that can change where you file, what steps come first, and how compensation is paid. The key is whether your claim falls under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act and what that means for caps, the Patient’s Compensation Fund, and deadlines.
The Indiana Medical Malpractice Act generally applies when the claim is against a qualified health care provider (a provider that meets the Act’s requirements, including carrying required malpractice coverage and participating in the state system). When the Act applies, claims typically run through the state process (including the medical review panel step) and are subject to statutory claim limits.
If a provider is not qualified under the Act, the claim may follow a different path. That’s why identifying provider status early is an important part of evaluating any Indiana malpractice case.
Indiana law caps total recovery in many malpractice cases based on when the malpractice occurred. For malpractice occurring after June 30, 2019, the total cap is $1,800,000.
In those cases, the provider’s responsibility is typically limited to $500,000, and the Patient’s Compensation Fund (PCF) can pay additional compensation above the provider’s share—up to the total cap—if the claim qualifies and the required steps are followed.
Because caps and PCF eligibility depend on timing and procedure, it’s important to match your claim to the correct date range and process before valuing the case.
In Indiana, a medical malpractice claim generally must be filed within 2 years of the alleged act, omission, or neglect (it’s typically not based on when you “discover” the problem).
There’s a major exception for young children: a minor under age six generally has until the child’s 8th birthday to file.
Also, filing a Proposed Complaint can toll the statute of limitations through the panel process, and for 90 days after the claimant receives the medical review panel’s opinion, so timing and filing sequence matter.
Medical malpractice can create losses that go far beyond the initial hospital bill, especially when the injury causes permanent limitations or future medical needs. If the evidence supports a claim, Indiana law may allow recovery for both economic losses (out-of-pocket costs) and non-economic harm (how the injury affects your daily life).
Compensation our medical negligence attorneys pursue incudes:
Severe outcomes often increase future-care and income-loss damages, such as:
If you think a medical mistake played a role in your injury, don’t wait for answers to come to you. Taking a few early steps can protect your care and protect the information needed to evaluate your care.
Medical malpractice claims in Indiana are procedural and evidence-heavy. The right legal team can help you avoid preventable missteps, build a clear record-based timeline, and present the claim in a way that fits Indiana’s requirements.
Here’s why patients and families choose Langer & Langer:
Over 100 years of combined experience:
Our attorneys bring decades of experience evaluating and litigating complex negligence claims.
Clear communication:
You’ll know what’s happening and why. We explain the process in plain language and keep you updated as the case moves forward.
Contingency fees:
You do not pay attorney fees unless we recover compensation. Clients may be responsible for costs and expenses.
Statewide representation:
We represent clients across Indiana, including Indianapolis and surrounding communities.
Our goal is to evaluate the facts carefully, pursue accountability under Indiana law, and seek fair compensation based on the evidence.
Below are examples of medical malpractice matters our firm has handled in Indiana. Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee a similar outcome.
We serve individuals and families across the entire state of Indiana. Our main office is located at 4 Indiana Ave, Valparaiso, IN 46383, and we handle medical malpractice claims arising from care provided in hospitals, clinics, and outpatient settings across the state.
We represent clients in communities including:
It depends. A claim is separate from your treatment. You can continue care or change providers. Keep conversations with providers focused on your health, and avoid discussing legal issues in the medical setting.
It depends. If you feel unsafe or ignored, get a second opinion and consider switching providers. Your health comes first. Continue necessary treatment while preserving records and documenting symptoms and timeline changes.
No. You do not have to formally report malpractice to evaluate a claim. What matters is preserving records, confirming deadlines, and determining whether the care fell below the standard of care.
It depends. A known risk does not automatically excuse negligence. The key question is whether the provider met the standard of care in prevention, monitoring, informed consent, and response when complications developed.
It depends. A pre-existing condition does not automatically bar a claim. The issue is whether negligent care caused additional injury or worsened your condition, and whether the records support a clear before-and-after timeline.
If something feels wrong about your medical care, you don’t have to figure it out on your own. A short conversation can help you understand what likely happened, whether your records raise concerns, and what steps make sense next.
We offer free consultations and explain things clearly, without pressure. There are no upfront attorney fees, and you only pay if compensation is recovered.
Call 219-356-2644 to speak with a medical malpractice lawyer, or use the contact form to request a consultation. We serve clients in Indianapolis and communities across Indiana.
© 1980-2026 Langer & Langer • All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 1980-2026 All Rights Reserved.
Past results do not guarantee any future outcome, and every case is different.
We improve our products and advertising by using Microsoft Clarity to see how you use our website. By using our site, you agree that we and Microsoft can collect and use this data.
Have legal questions or need expert advice? Our experienced team is here to help.
Langer & Langer
Accessibility Statement
Compliance status
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email
Screen-reader and keyboard navigation
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
Disability profiles supported in our website
Additional UI, design, and readability adjustments
Browser and assistive technology compatibility
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers).
Notes, comments, and feedback
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs. There may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to
